Who scolds the sectional title tenants when they break the rules
By Paddocks
Finding a suitable tenant to rent investment units in sectional title is becoming increasingly difficult. Credit checks, phone calls to previous landlords and checking for criminal records may show that the potential tenant is ‘clean’ but there can never be an absolute guarantee as to how the tenant will behave. Once owners are satisfied that they have found the right tenant, all that’s needed is to sign the lease and owners have nothing to worry about, right?
But what if the tenant turns out to be a nightmare and causes havoc in the scheme?
The legislation governing sectional title schemes in South Africa focuses on the direct relationship between bodies corporate and owners. But what does it have to say about tenants?
The Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act, 8 of 2011 (“the SMSTA”) provides that a scheme’s rules bind the body corporate, owners of sections and any person occupying a section. It also provides that the body corporate has the power to do whatever is reasonably necessary to enforce the rules. One of its obligations in this regard is to deliver a copy of the rules to any person who becomes an occupier of a section. The Rental Housing Act requires a copy of the scheme rules to be attached to a written lease, so one way or another tenants are made aware of the rules and know that they must comply with them!
What if they do not? Buy‐to‐let investor landlords need to know their liability in relation to their tenant’s actions.
The prescribed rules require owners to take all reasonable steps to ensure compliance with the conduct rules by their tenant or other occupant of their section, including employees, guests and any member of his family, their lessee or their occupant and also and to ensure that they do not behave in a way likely to interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of another section or another person’s peaceful enjoyment of the common property.
While owners must take reasonable steps to make sure their tenants behave, they are not responsible for their tenants’ breaches of rules or other wrongdoings. For example, if a tenant damages common property, such as crashing their car into the scheme’s gate, the body corporate should institute a delictual action against the tenant to reclaim the costs of repairing the gate, rather than making a claim against the owner landlord.
The Community Schemes Ombud Service Act, 9 of 2011 (“the CSOSA”) provides an easy and inexpensive route for the body corporate to follow to deal directly with tenants’ breaches of the rules or delictual actions. The CSOSA makes provision for specific requests for relief that deal with behaviour issues as well as the payment of specified amounts of money. While not all sectional title bodies corporate have fining provisions in their rules (essential for imposing valid fines) most do and the fine can be collected in terms of a CSOS order, if the tenant refuses to pay.
In the past it was common practice for trustees or the managing agent to hold owners directly responsible for their tenant’s misbehaviour and even fine them, but the requirements in the SMSTA and prescribed rules that owners “take reasonable steps”, removes the positive obligation of owners to ensure their tenants obey the rules. Additionally, the prescribed rules now require an enabling provision in the scheme rules for the body corporate to add fines to an owners account. The members would have to make a specific rule that allowed the body corporate to fine them for their tenants’ transgressions – highly unlikely to happen!
The new sectional title legislation makes it much easier for the body corporate to deal directly with misbehaving tenants and makes it harder to leave it to the owner to do.
Thinking Inside the Box 
This contradicts your other article at this location : https://www.paddocks.co.za/paddocks-press-newsletter/the-relationship-between-a-body-corporate-and-tenants-in-the-scheme/
which is saying owners are totally responsible for tenant’s behaviour. Specifically this paragraph :
The prescribed rules require owners to take all reasonable steps to ensure compliance with the conduct rules by their tenant or other occupant of their section, including employees, guests and any member of his family, their lessee or their occupant and also and to ensure that they do not behave in a way likely to interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of another section or another person’s peaceful enjoyment of the common property.
Hi Mike, the article you are referring to is from 2010, and does not take the current legislation into account. If you would like a clear explanation of this under the current legislation, please send your query to consulting@paddocks.co.za, and the team will provide a no-obligation quote for their assistance with your matter.
Kind regards
Paddocks
What happens if the conduct rules (approved and registered by te estate agency board) clealy state that transgressions will incur a fine but the trustee chairman and the managing agent are reluctant to fine people
Hi Dinah,
Thank you for your comment. We would love to help, however we do not give free advice. Here’s how we can help:
– We offer consulting via telephone for R490 for 10 minutes. Please call us on 021 686 3950.
– We have Paddocks Club, an exclusive online club, to help you get answers to your questions about community schemes.
Kind regards,
Paddocks
Pingback: Here’s why bodies corporate can fine misbehaving tenants – HomeTimes