Thinking Inside the Box

A Paddocks Sectional Title Lifestyle Blog

Can the Trustees Disconnect My Electricity?

can trustees disconnect electricity

Carryn Durham, who manages the Paddocks Consulting Team, is a featured property-law expert on Property24. She recently answered a reader question about whether the trustees of a body corporate are entitled to disconnect electricity due to arrear levies. Read the interesting question and answer below:

The question:

A Property24 reader says her electricity has been cut due to short payment of levies. Is this legal?

“I am in a situation where the secretary of the trustees decided to cut my electricity supply due to short payment of the levies. I have my own account with the municipality and we don’t share the bill with the body corporate. And without even following the legal process, my electricity was turned off.

Please advise what steps I should take.”

The answer:

The trustees cannot disconnect electricity supplies without either a statutory right to do so or an order of court authorising the disconnection. It is illegal to “take the law into your own hands” in an attempt to force owners to pay outstanding levies.

There is South African legislation that makes shutting off services an offence. In terms of the Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999 section 16(hA) (which deals with matters arising between landlord and tenant):

“Any person who unlawfully locks out a tenant or shuts off the utilities to the rental housing property will be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or imprisonment not exceeding two years or to both such fine and such imprisonment.”

Previously the Electricity Act 41 of 1987 section 27(3) made it an offence (liable for a fine and/or imprisonment) for any person without legal right to cut off or damage or interfere with any apparatus for generating, transmitting, or supplying electricity. This Act was repealed and replaced by the Electricity Regulation Act 4 of 2006. Section 22 deals with the powers and duties of a licensee and states that only the holder of a license, granted by the Regulator, may disconnect an electricity supply subject to the conditions set out in section 22(5). Only a “licensee” may disconnect someone’s electricity for non-payment (in terms of section 15(1)(n) and section 22(5) of the Act).

Therefore, bulk suppliers of the electricity such as Eskom or a subsidiary supplier such as a local authority or City Power can disconnect the supply of electricity in response to non-payment of the account and after due notice has been given. This has been held to be a legitimate act. However, a body corporate is not a “licensee,” but a “distributor” in terms of the Electricity Regulation Act, and is not entitled to cut off the supply of any service to a section when one of its members is in arrears with their levies. This is an act of “spoliation” ie. taking the law into one’s own hands.

The illegal disconnection of electricity to a unit by a body corporate was dealt with by the High Court in the case of Queensgate Body Corporate v Claesen (A3076_98) [1998] ZAGPHC 1 (26 November 1998). The court confirmed the scope of spoliation as was summarised in Nino Bonino v De Lange 1906 TS 120 at 122 where Innes, CJ said:

“It is a fundamental principle that no man is allowed to take the law into his own hands. No one is permitted to dispossess another forcibly or wrongfully and against his consent of the possession of property whether movable or immovable. If he does so the court will summarily restore the status quo ante and will do that as a preliminary to any enquiry or investigation into the merits of the dispute. It is not necessary to refer to any authority upon a principle so clear.”

In this case the body corporate’s counsel argued that the act was taken in accordance with the scheme’s rules, duly made under the Sectional Titles Act. This argument was held to be without merit. The court said:

“The clause giving the appellant the right to cut off electricity of any unit owner who is in arrears with his or her levies is clearly contrary to the common law. It constitutes nothing but a power to interfere with such person’s right to use the existing electricity supply. The instant case is an a fortiori example of spoliation.  … no court would have had the power to deprive any holder of his or her electricity supply in the circumstances the appellant has done. It is a clear act of spoliation and there was no consent valid in law to such an act.”

The Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 provides in sections 37(2) and 37(2A) a specific remedy for the non-payment of levies. The body corporate can recover the levies from the owner in the magistrates or the High Court.

Unfortunately bodies corporate persist in disconnecting (and charging re-connection fees) to owners who are in arrears with their levies because it is seen as an effective remedy. Often the owner is not in a financial position to go to court to resist the spoliation and to obtain an order to have the electricity supply immediately restored. This leaves the owner with little choice but to pay so that their electricity is reconnected.

Hopefully once the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 is in operation it will address this issue by giving owners who cannot afford lawyers and expensive court fees the ability to resist spoliation.

Has the electricity been disconnected due to arrear levies in your scheme or any of the schemes you manage? Share with us by commenting below.

Image source: nepalenergyforum.com

Advertisements

10 comments on “Can the Trustees Disconnect My Electricity?

  1. Joey Killian
    May 11, 2016

    Can a body corporate receive one bill and divide it amongst tenants based on square meters rented or owned?

    • Paddocks
      May 11, 2016

      Hi Joey,

      Thanks for your question. A body corporate can only recover expenses from a registered member (an owner of a unit) and not a tenant. Expenses are recovered from members in accordance with their participation quota, unless a different determination is agreed upon, as set out in Section 32(4) of the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986.

      Thanks,
      Paddocks

  2. Sharon Ball
    August 26, 2015

    What about “restricting” the use of power – only limited supply of electricity in the case of arrear levies. So not totally cut off? Have lights but no stove etc. Is this legal?

  3. James Cameron
    November 18, 2014

    Assume a situation where the BC purchases electricity in bulk from the municipality and each residential unit has an electricity meter that is read each month, the BC bills each owner each month for electricity. Given the above scenario and where an owner has been warned because his electricity is in arrears, may the BC disconnect his electricity supply for non payment of electricity?

    • I so wish it was legal to switch off the supply to a defaulting owner’s unit. CityPower told me when they installed our new “smart meter” that CityPower supplies electricity to the main distribution board and what the Body Corporate decides to do with it afterward is the Body Corporate’s right, CityPower has no interest in what we do with it after it leaves the “smart meter”. If this is the case, and can be supported by law, the Trustees do indeed have the RIGHT to terminate a defaulting owner’s electricity due to non-payment of account.

  4. Les Reynard
    November 17, 2014

    What about the installing of a water restricter – this allows a minimal amount of water to enter the unit ?

    • camelotwindsor
      November 17, 2014

      That’s all very well with separate water meters and shutoff valves. Our block was built in the late 1960s or early 1970s as a rental building of 12 units, with no thought as to separating water supply.

  5. Rod Flugel
    November 13, 2014

    The Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 provides in sections 37(2) and 37(2A) a specific remedy for the non-payment of levies. The body corporate can recover the levies from the owner in the magistrates or the High Court.
    may I enter a new concern: the owner has defaulted on levy payments, receives a substantial rent (R5000.00per month for her property) and I have followed the legal route and all she pays as per magistrate is R150 per month which goes straight to legal fees, the BC receives nil and the levy situation escalates. she is currently indebt to a tune of overR20,000 rand and climbing. what can I do ?

  6. Graham
    November 13, 2014

    What does “statutory right” mean as stated in The article?

    Sent from my iPhone and hopefully gets to you!

    >

  7. Jeanette
    November 13, 2014

    Dear Paddocks,

    Thank you for the interesting read, I do however have a question which was not dealt with in the read. In our Sectional Title Scheme, the different flats do not have individual electricity meters, everyone contributes to the bulk electricity account in accordance with their participation quota via the levy. The bulk electricity account is in the name of the Body Corporate. Does the principal of the Body Corporate only being the “distributer” still apply or can the Body Corporate cut the electricity in this case?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow us on Twitter

Address:

+27 (0)21 686 3950
Mon - Fri
8am - 5pm

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 426 other followers

%d bloggers like this: